An argument presenting both sides of the global warming issue, focusing on whether it is a real issue or merely a hypothesis concocted by scientists to prevent environmental pollution.
The following paper examines both sides of the global warming issue. The writer discusses the first issue, by making reference to ecological perspectives that claim that certain human activity such as population growth, deforestation, and fossil fuel burning, have lead to increasing solar radiation or heat in the earth’s atmosphere, thus increasing the natural temperature of the earth. The paper also deals with the reverse argument which questions whether humans are really increasing the earth’s temperature at a alarming rate, or whether humanity is just a ripple in the earth’s pool of history, and warmth is simply nature taking its course.
Global warming is a very important environmental issue concerning the world today and the future of humanity. The issue with global warming is certain human activity such as population growth, deforestation, and fossil fuel burning, have lead some scientists to hypothesize that humans are increasing solar radiation or heat in the earth’s atmosphere, thus increasing the natural temperature of the earth. Some greenhouse gases are naturally produced in the Earth’s atmosphere from water vapor, and carbon dioxide. The earth’s history also shows how the overall temperature of the earth’s surface has fluctuated throughout its existence. A problem that arises with the global warming debate is weather patterns have only been traced back to about one hundred and fifty years; therefore it is hard to predict the outcome of the future with such a short past. Another argument surrounding global warming is, are humans really increasing the earth’s temperature at a alarming rate, or is humanity just a ripple in the earth’s pool of history, and this warmth is nature taking its course? The answers to these questions depend on who you ask, or your view of nature’s role on earth.